Contact

 

 

 

 

This area does not yet contain any content.
This form does not yet contain any fields.
    « Rain:1...Freedom Rally:0 | Main | Dallas Tea Party Double Dog Dares KO »
    Tuesday
    Feb232010

    The Climate Jig Is Up

    "The jig is up." That's right, IPCC. That's right, EPA. That's right, soon-to-be-supoenaed Al Gore (I can dream, can't I?) The anthropomorphic climate change theories that you all have been hawking for the last decade have been proven false. I like Ed Begley, Jr. I've met and talked to him and really like the guy. But he personified all the intolerance and hysteria the left has spewed over this one issue, and this one clip with Stuart Varney says it all:

    So now, as the rat criminals would say in days gone by when cornered, the jig is, indeed, up. As was reported in Pajamas Media by Charlie Martin,  Sen. James Inhofe has asked for a congressional investigation of all Americans involved in “the greatest scientific scandal of our generation,” including Michael Mann of Penn State, Dr.(?) James Hanses of Columbia and NASA and Where's Waldo Al Gore. Martin goes on:

    Since the Climategate Files were released, the IPCC has been forced to retract a number of specific conclusions — such as a prediction that Himalayan glaciers would disappear by 2035 — and has been forced to confirm that the report was based in large part on reports from environmental activist groups instead of peer-reviewed scientific literature. Dr. Murari Lal, an editor of the IPCC AR4 report, admitted to the London Daily Mail that he had known the 2035 date was false, but was included in the report anyway “purely to put political pressure on world leaders.”

    No one's expecting the majority to roll with this as they have stalled past calls for investigations, but the heat is on and Inhofe is turning it up. Those who saw the IPCC evidence of foul play before the East Anglia emails now have facts to back up what we knew: that the IPCC had started from a premise (basically they wrote the summary first) and had "scientists" write their opinions next then find some "data" to support the summary.

    I'm sorry, Ed, but you have to stop the blathering. You are a smarter man that. I do give you credit for walking the walk (or, in your case, pedaling the toast) but I don't think you want to go any more out on a cracking limb, especially with YouTube around.

    Reader Comments

    There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

    PostPost a New Comment

    Enter your information below to add a new comment.

    My response is on my own website »
    Author Email (optional):
    Author URL (optional):
    Post:
     
    Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>